Logo image
Employment experiences of formerly homeless adults with serious mental illness in Housing First versus treatment first supportive housing programs
Accepted manuscript   Open access   Peer reviewed

Employment experiences of formerly homeless adults with serious mental illness in Housing First versus treatment first supportive housing programs

Emmy Tiderington, Benjamin F. Henwood, Deborah Padgett and Bikki Tran Smith
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-d6ay-k520

Abstract

Employment Recovery Homeless Supportive housing Housing First
Objective: This paper examines how formerly homeless adults with serious mental illness living in Housing First (HF) and “treatment first” (TF) supportive housing programs experience employment. Research questions include: How do these individuals experience employment in the context of their mental health recovery? What do they perceive as the benefits of and obstacles to attaining employment? Are there programmatic differences in their employment experiences? Methods: Case study analyses of data from a federally-funded qualitative study were conducted of 40 individuals purposively sampled from a HF and a TF program. Data were independently analyzed and consensually discussed to develop cross-case themes.Results: Three themes emerged: 1) the meaning of work, 2) working within the system, and 3) balancing treatment requirements and work. While none of the study participants had full-time jobs, more HF program clients had part-time employment than their TF counterparts. Of the 12 employed participants, all but two worked within their respective programs. Participants in both groups described similar benefits of obtaining employment but TF program requirements inhibited job-seeking. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: These findings provide insight into the challenges of obtaining employment for formerly homeless individuals with serious mental illness residing in supportive housing. Despite the motivation to work, individual, structural, and organizational factors impeded employment. To address this problem, factors at each of these levels will need to be considered. Interventions such as supported employment (SE) offer promise to supportive housing programs committed to employment as a contributor to recovery
pdf
original-1-00094648145.73 kBDownloadView
Accepted Manuscript (AM) Open Access
url
Report an accessibility issueView
Please complete a content remediation request to report an accessibility issue with a library electronic resource, website, or service.

Metrics

164 File downloads
195 Record Views

Details

Logo image