Logo image
Comparison of select reference management tools
Accepted manuscript   Open access   Peer reviewed

Comparison of select reference management tools

Yingting Zhang
Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Vol.31(1), pp.45-60
2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-sc05-xb91

Abstract

Bibliographic management software Bookmarking tools Citation managers Citation generators Connotea EndNote EndNote Web Mendeley Desktop Mendeley Web Reference management tools Reference managers Reference organizers Research tools Zotero
Bibliographic management tools have been widely used by researchers to store, organize, and manage their references for research papers, theses, dissertations, journal articles, and other publications. There are a number of reference management tools available. In order for users to decide which tool is best for their needs, it is important to know each tool’s strengths and weaknesses. This article compares four reference management tools, one of which is licensed by University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey libraries and the other three are open source and freely available. They were chosen based on their functionality, ease of use, availability to library users, and popularity. These four tools are: EndNote / EndNote Web, Zotero, Connotea, and Mendeley Desktop / Mendeley Web. Each tool is analyzed in terms of the following features: accessing, collecting, organizing, collaborating, and citing/formatting. A comparison table is included to summarize the key features of these tools.
pdf
mrsq3101zhang_final-AcceptedManuscript432.46 kBDownloadView
Accepted Manuscript (AM) Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.641841View
Version of Record (VoR) Medical Reference Services Quarterly
url
Report an accessibility issueView
Please complete a content remediation request to report an accessibility issue with a library electronic resource, website, or service.

Metrics

1176 File downloads
286 Record Views

Details

Logo image