Logo image
The Neural Basis of Successful Word Reading in Aphasia
Accepted manuscript   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Neural Basis of Successful Word Reading in Aphasia

Sara B. Pillay, William L. Gross, William W. Graves, Colin Humphries, Diane S. Book and Jeffrey R. Binder
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, pp.1-12
2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7282/T3N58QJM

Abstract

Reading Aphasia fMRI Phonology Semantics
Objective: Understanding the neural basis of recovery from stroke is a major research goal. Many functional neuroimaging studies have identified changes in brain activity in people with aphasia, but it is unclear whether these changes truly support successful performance or merely reflect increased task difficulty. We addressed this problem by examining differences in brain activity associated with correct and incorrect responses on an overt reading task. On the basis of previous proposals that semantic retrieval can assist pronunciation of written words, we hypothesized that recruitment of semantic areas would be greater on successful trials. Methods: Participants were 21 patients with left-hemisphere stroke with phonologic retrieval deficits. They read words aloud during an event-related fMRI paradigm. BOLD signals obtained during correct and incorrect trials were contrasted to highlight brain activity specific to successful trials. Results: Successful word reading was associated with higher BOLD signal in the left angular gyrus. In contrast, BOLD signal in bilateral posterior inferior frontal cortex, SMA, and anterior cingulate cortex was greater on incorrect trials. Interpretation: These data show for the first time the brain regions where neural activity is correlated specifically with successful performance in people with aphasia. The angular gyrus is a key node in the semantic network, consistent with the hypothesis that additional recruitment of the semantic system contributes to successful word production when phonologic retrieval is impaired. Higher activity in other brain regions during incorrect trials likely reflects secondary engagement of attention, working memory, and error monitoring processes when phonologic retrieval is unsuccessful.
pdf
s1-ln28272640-1099613696-1939656818Hwf-645777709IdV-32203176628272640PDF_HI0001853.33 kBDownloadView
Accepted Manuscript Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01214View
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
url
Report an accessibility issueView
Please complete a content remediation request to report an accessibility issue with a library electronic resource, website, or service.

Metrics

330 File downloads
102 Record Views

Details

Logo image