Logo image
Who Should Pick the Winners of Climate Change?
Accepted manuscript   Open access   Peer reviewed

Who Should Pick the Winners of Climate Change?

Michael S. Webster, Madhavi A. Colton, Emily S. Darling, Jonathan Armstrong, Malin L. Pinsky, Nancy Knowlton and Daniel E. Schindler
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol.32(3), pp.167-173
2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7282/T3NC642M

Abstract

Adaptation Portfolio theory Natural selection Conservation Coral reefs
Many conservation strategies identify a narrow subset of genotypes, species, or geographic locations that are predicted to be favored under different scenarios of future climate change. However, a focus on predicted winners, which might not prove to be correct, risks undervaluing the balance of biological diversity from which climate-change winners could otherwise emerge. Drawing on ecology, evolutionary biology, and portfolio theory, we propose a conservation approach designed to promote adaptation that is less dependent on uncertain predictions about the identity of winners and losers. By designing actions to facilitate numerous opportunities for selection across biological and environmental conditions, we can allow nature to pick the winners and increase the probability that ecosystems continue to provide services to humans and other species.
pdf
rutgers-lib-53561_PDF-1168.83 kBDownloadView
Accepted Manuscript Open Access
url
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.007View
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
url
Report an accessibility issueView
Please complete a content remediation request to report an accessibility issue with a library electronic resource, website, or service.

Metrics

481 File downloads
173 Record Views

Details

Logo image