Logo image
An arbitration agenda for the Biden administration
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

An arbitration agenda for the Biden administration

David L Noll and Zachary D. Clopton
University of Illinois Law Review Online, pp.104-110
04/30/2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7282/00000100

Abstract

Civil Procedure Administrative Law Arbitration
In recent decades, increased use of forced arbitration provisions has blunted the impact of regulatory schemes that are enforced through private civil litigation. The major institutional driver of expansions in arbitration law has been the Supreme Court. But federal administrative agencies and executive departments can play an important, if underappreciated, role in addressing harmful uses of arbitration. This essay--prepared for the University of Illinois Law Review's symposium on the Biden administration’s first 100 days--highlights the tools available to agencies and executive departments to address the effects of forced arbitration and offers suggestions for how they might be used. Executive branch action alone cannot undo all of the arbitration’s effects on private regulatory enforcement; but it can do much to restore this engine of the U.S. legal system.
pdf
Noll-Clopton-Final61.55 kBDownloadView
Version of Record (VoR) Open Access
url
https://www.illinoislawreview.org/symposium/first-100-days-biden/an-arbitration-agenda-for-the-biden-administration/View
Version of Record (VoR) University of Illinois Law Review Online
url
Report an accessibility issueView
Please complete a content remediation request to report an accessibility issue with a library electronic resource, website, or service.

Metrics

37 File downloads
52 Record Views

Details

Logo image