Abstract
It is controversial whether money-stock targeting without base drift (i.e., following a trend-stationary growth path) makes the price level more predictable in the presence of permanent shocks to money demand. We develop a procedure that is not subject to the Lucas critique. Applying this procedure to the case of the U.K., we find that the variance of the trend inflation rate in the U.K. would have been reduced by more than one half if the Bank of England had not allowed base drift.