Logo image
Using, risking, and consent: why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Using, risking, and consent: why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects

Alec D Walen
Bioethics, Vol.34(9), pp.899-905
11/01/2020
PMID: 32266732

Abstract

Means principle risk research ethics bystanders
Subjects in studies on humans are used as a means of conducting the research and achieving whatever good would justify putting them at risk. Accordingly, consent must normally be obtained before subjects are exposed to any substantial risks to their welfare. Bystanders are also often put at risk, but they are not used as a means. Accordingly—or so I argue—consent is more often unnecessary before bystanders are exposed to similar substantial risks to their welfare.
pdf
Using, Risking, and Consent186.85 kBDownloadView
Accepted Manuscript (AM) Open Access
url
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12743View
Version of Record (VoR) Bioethics
url
Report an accessibility issueView
Please complete a content remediation request to report an accessibility issue with a library electronic resource, website, or service.

Metrics

160 File downloads
35 Record Views

Details

Logo image